Congratulations to A.G. Roeber, whose Changing Churches: An Orthodox, Catholic, and Lutheran Theological Conversation, written with Mickey Mattox, has just appeared from Eerdmans.
The full article may be viewed here.
Historian Gary Cross traces the cultural context of modern male immaturity.
When, exactly, did the development-challenged male become a cultural archetype? You know the guy. Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell, and Seth Rogen, to name a few, have made careers out of playing him. Directors like the Farrelly brothers have turned him into box-office gold. We laugh at his antics and shake our heads at the same time. On the screen it’s de rigueur for men to be boys—but what about in real life?
For a sizable segment of adult American males, Gary Cross says, being a real-life “Peter Pan” is a lifestyle choice. Cross, Distinguished Professor of History at Penn State, has a name for these men.
“The ‘boy-man,’” he writes, “is the male who is biologically mature and sometimes even occupationally established, but who finds difficulty transitioning from the social and cultural worlds of late adolescence. He continues to embrace the pleasures of youth and avoid the emotional and social maturity required of males in modern adult life, including marriage and other social commitments.”
In his book Men to Boys: The Making of Modern Immaturity, Cross seeks the roots of this phenomenon, tracing changes in U.S. popular culture across three generations— his father’s, his own, and his sons’, since before World War II. The book examines popular role models, the effects of rising consumerism, and the shifting societal roles of men.
Andy and The Judge
His father’s generation, Cross notes, had ample pop-cultural examples of the responsible adult male—models rooted in the Victorian patriarch and presented as a desirable goal for boys. In the Andy Hardy movies popular in the 1930s and 1940s, Andy was reckless and adventurous, “the ideal son on his way to manhood,” while his father—“the Judge”—was the model modern father and firmly but gently guided Andy through painful teenage troubles and toward “a mature perspective, and a true and certain future.”
Radio and television offered their own brand of role model as well. Westerns—already established through radio and successfully transitioning to television—and shows like “Father Knows Best” and “Leave it to Beaver” featured adult males who exhibited mature behavior, willingly took on responsibility and “always did the right thing.” From the 1930s through the 1950s there were plenty of men to look up to. Incompetent men—fathers and otherwise— were ridiculed and held up as cautionary tales.
However, societal roles for men gradually started to change during World War II and ultimately there was no going back. Traditional gender roles were no longer set in stone, and postwar births skyrocketed. Industrialization and rising consumerism meant the average American father spent more time at work. Less time at home made it difficult for Dad to be much more than a provider and disciplinarian.
Hobbies and sports increasingly became the way for fathers and sons to connect, at the same time allowing men to embrace their inner children in a socially-approved way. Over time this change began to cause confusion among men, says Cross: Was the father to be model of adulthood, or friend and playmate?
The Rise of the “Cool”
Shows like “Father Knows Best” had portrayed a kind of merging of the two ideals, Cross says, with hard-working but easy-going fathers intimately involved in their sons’ activities, but still ready to provide a stern talking-to when Mom was out of her depth.
However, the seeds of rebellion had been sown, writes Cross. Some men of his father’s generation rejected the examples of Judge Hardy and his descendants. These same men as boys had been put off by Andy Hardy’s “goody-two-shoes” model of boyhood, replacing it with what Cross calls the “cool.”
“Rooted in a new commercial culture of the comic book, Saturday-matinee crime and science fiction movies, and the hot music and dance scene, the cool emerged almost twenty years before rock and roll,” Cross writes.
Of course there were and always will be rebels, he writes. Characters like tough-guy private eye Sam Spade, neither married nor a father, held great appeal for boys and men in the 1940s. “Images of men with dark, uncertain passions facing unpredictable or hostile worlds” grew in numbers on-screen. The rise of Hugh Hefner’s Playboy empire in the 1950s fueled the attraction of an adulthood that rejected conventional maturity and was against “settling” and was therefore anti-marriage and anti-father.
Boom Goes the Generation
The boomer generation, growing up with Vietnam, feminism, sexual liberation, and the rise of youth culture, went beyond scorning Andy and the Judge; they mocked icons of stoic masculinity like John Wayne. A new kind of sitcom, Cross says, mirrored what many felt about the older generation: "All in the Family,” with Archie Bunker as the “arch-dysfunctional father” to his liberal son-in-law, Mike.
Boomers “thought that we could shed a lot of the markers of manhood—obeying and being obeyed, self-repression, and participating in traditional rites of passage,” Cross says. “All of these things, we believed, had nothing to do with growing up, and instead served as a crutch. We didn’t need older mentors to show us the way.”
As time went on, he says, the popular media began to reflect—and influence—this reaction. 1970s television and movie Westerns were very different than their previous counterparts, moving towards comedies featuring adult men acting ridiculously (“Blazing Saddles,” “F-Troop”) and epics about antiheroes (“The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”).
“The more abiding change," says Cross, "was not new models of male maturity but a rejection of the old western myths for presumably greater realism. Over time, this led to an aesthetic of ‘action’—visually exciting, almost sensual violence—in contrast to the traditional moral tale about making choices and recognizing the consequences of action.”
Boys Will be Boys
Not long after, Cross notes, aging boomers feeling pangs of nostalgia sought to recapture their younger selves, pushing off age and maturity as long as possible. Television shows like “The Cosby Show" tried to revive the lost role models of many a boomer childhood. A throw-back to earlier sitcom characters, Bill Cosby's Dr. Heathcliff Huxtable was “sometimes a cool dad, but, as both a good father and a modern professional, he was always the voice of maturity.”
Even though these shows were popular, Cross writes that by the end of the 1980s, “television took a sharp turn away from the bemusement of elders and cute antics of kids, giving way to shows that mocked the old formula.” “Married With Children,” with incompetent father Ted Bundy and his equally dysfunctional family, presented a very un-Cosby-like image to boys and men. Even as over-the-top comedy, the idea seemed to be that male responsibility was a “prison” to be avoided at all costs, Cross says. Not surprisingly, he says, his son’s generation took the lengthening of childhood even further.
He adds, "My generation of boomers has largely abandoned the task of passing on culture to the next generation, partially out of self-doubt about its value. Thus instead of rebelling against a past they thought was imposed on them, as we did, the young today ignore it.”
For Better and Worse
Reinforced by consumer marketing, the cultures of boys and of men have become increasingly one and the same, says Cross. Today boy-men are ubiquitous—and popular—on the big screen and the little: “Dumb and Dumber,” “Big Daddy,” “Hangover,” and “Two and a Half Men,” to name a few. At the same time, the difference between what appeals to adults and to children is rapidly disappearing: videogames, for example, once the province of boys alone, are now marketed simultaneously to both.
What’s been lost, Cross suggests, is a timeworn definition of what constitutes male maturity: “responsibility for others, cultivation of emotional and aesthetic life, and recognition of the distinctions between generations and ages.”
He is quick to stipulate that he’s not calling for a return to the role models of the 1950s and with it, early marriage. “It didn’t work then and it won’t work now. But those older markers of maturity have not been replaced by new ones more appropriate for our times,” he laments. We have rebelled against both of the idealized roles of Andy and the Judge, without replacing them with new ideals.
“For both better and worse, two generations ago men began to abandon both the Victorian patriarch and the boyhood striving toward manhood, complete with its comedies and tragedies,” Cross writes. “We cannot and should not try to restore the old patriarchy or the old ideals of gentility—the former unacceptable in a gender-equal society and the latter based on fear of change and class prejudice.
“But this doesn’t mean that we should reject the idea of maturity.”
Gary Cross, Ph.D., is distinguished professor of modern history, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Congratulations to Rachel Moran, who presented her paper entitled “Puny and Pudgy Privates: Measuring Draftees for WWII" at the History of Science Society annual meeting in Cleveland. Rachel was also awarded a NSF travel grant to attend this conference. In January, Rachel will be presenting her paper entitled “The Advisory State: Physical Fitness through the Ad Council, 1955-1965” at the AHA in Chicago.
Congratulations to Matthew Restall who, with Amara Solari, published an op-ed piece on their new book, 2012: The Western Roots of the Maya Apocalypse in The Washington Post. The piece can be accessed online at: (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-2012-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/2011/12/27/gIQAoDIxQP_story.html).
Congratulations to Philip Jenkins, whose History of the United State has just appeared in its fourth edition from Palgrave Macmillian.
Congratulations to Evan Rothera who presented his paper entitled “Failed Rebellions, Their Causes, and Their Legacies: An Episode in United States and Argentine Comparative History” at The Legacy of the Civil War interdisciplinary conference at Chestnut Hill College.
Will Bryan presents paper at The Southern Historical Association Annual Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland
Congratulations to Will Bryan who presented his paper entitled “Dreadful, Soothing, and Delightful: Savannah’s Bonaventure Cemetery and New South Tourism” at The Southern Historical Association Annual Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland.
Erik Bolt presents paper at the University of Pittsburgh Battlefields: Sights and Sounds of Conflict graduate conference
Congratulations to Erik Bolt, who presented his paper entitled “Reclaiming Ancient Epic: The Homeric Battlefield in Meynin and the Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy" at the University of Pittsburgh Battlefields: Sights and Sounds of Conflict graduate conference.
Congratulations to Nan Woodruff, whose American Congo will be reprinted in paperback in February. Comparing the Mississippi Delta to Belgium King Leopold's Congo colony, Woodruff chronicles the freedom struggles of the Delta's African American residents in the early 20th century.
Congratulations to Annie Rose, whose paper "The Invention of Uncertainty in American Psychology: Intellectual Conflict and Rhetorical Resolution, 1890-1930" has appeared in History of Psychology 14 (2011):356-82.
Congratulations to Philip Jenkins who participated in a panel on Confronting Islamophobia and chaired a panel on charismatic and Pentecostal Healing at the annual conference of the American Academy of Religion, held in San Francisco, November 2011.
Congratulations to Lori Ginzberg who is being honored as a University Lecturer at Cornell in March. In January, Lori will be lecturing to teachers in Florida as part of the OAH Distinguished Lecture Series.
Congratulations to Mark Munn, who has been invited to deliver the keynote address, entitled “When did Thucydides write, and Why does it matter?” to the Ancient Historian’s Colloquium of the Atlantic States, at Vassar College on November 18, 2011.
Mark Neely's "Lincoln and the Triumph of the Nation: Constitutional Conflict in the American Civil War" published
Congratulations to Mark Neely, whose Lincoln and the Triumph of the Nation: Constitutional Conflict in the American Civil War, has just appeared from UNC Press and was featured in Penn State Live: http://live.psu.edu/story/56244#nw1.
Cathy Wanner co-organizes "Diverse Landscape of Ukraine: A Celebration of 20 Years of Independence" international symposium
Congratulations to Cathy Wanner who co-organized an international symposium on the Diverse Landscapes of Ukraine: A Celebration of 20 Years of Independence (Sept. 30-Oct. 1 in Weaver 102) so well attended that it was standing room only.
Evan Rothera presents paper entitled “Beyond Comparative Emancipation: Comparative Reconstructions as a Category of Analysis" at an international conference in Germany
Congratulations to Evan Rothera, who presented his paper entitled “Beyond Comparative Emancipation: Comparative Reconstructions as a Category of Analysis" at an international conference on the Transnational Significance of the American Civil War: A Global History conference at Freiedrich-Schiller University in Jena, Germany.
Michael Tuttle wins Clark G. Reynold Student Paper Award for his paper entitled "Women in Western Waters: Myth and Reality"
Congratulations to Michael Tuttle, who presented a paper entitled “Women in Western Waters: Myth and Reality” at the 2011 North American Society for Oceanic History (NASOH) meeting, Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. The paper won the Clark G. Reynolds Student Paper Award. He also presented a paper entitled “Recent Historic and Archaeological Investigations at the Civil War-Era Battle of Johnsonville, Tennessee Site” at the 2011 Ohio Valley History Conference, Murray State University.
Congratulations to Dan Letwin, whose edited volume, The American South: A Reader and Guide, was recently published by Edinburgh University Press.
Congratulations to Philip Jenkins, whose Laying Down the Sword: Why We Can’t Ignore the Bible’s Violent Verses, has just appeared from Harper One, and whose The Next Christendom has appeared in a revised third edition (OUP, 2011).